Thursday, March 17, 2011
Wholesale Club Wear Dresses Eu
Shoe Trend 2011: National Exhibition
http://www.fashionblog.it/post/12637/tendenza-scarpe-le-stringate-di-repetto
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Where To Buy Wooden Fingerboards In New York
Banda Bassotti against broadband
The other day I heard on Massimo Gramellini TV saying the government has set aside funds already provided for broadband to digital terrestrial. I was impressed because it is a lot of money. These are a few that give news is that it is important to know to understand, once again, to whom we are governed.
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2011/03/15/senza-banda-larga-a-causa-del-monopolio-tv/97680/ 
The other day I heard on Massimo Gramellini TV saying the government has set aside funds already provided for broadband to digital terrestrial. I was impressed because it is a lot of money. These are a few that give news is that it is important to know to understand, once again, to whom we are governed.
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2011/03/15/senza-banda-larga-a-causa-del-monopolio-tv/97680/
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Pokemon Deluge Antigo
IN PRAISE OF PRAISE IN DARK
Many of us have had to deal with from an early age the reproach of not able to express ourselves clearly. "You speak and write more clearly," the teacher shouted at us with his stern look and signed in red with a "just enough", to little thoughts. "You can know what you tell me?" continued to ask his girlfriend first and then wife in front of our attempts to say anything clear at least the more mundane chores of everyday life. "Dad, I do not understand you, "was the phrase most often our children as soon as they realized that they have a thinking mind.
What then enjoy the clarity of great social and cultural prestige is testified to like about it, so say, is based on value judgments of a number of strikingly diverse disciplines and professions. Journalists, representatives, lawyers, teachers, doctors, clerks, politicians, ushers and so on, are good, they believe, if you explain in more simple and clearly as possible the affairs of their discipline and their work. In reality there are many reasons to consider that the clarity is, on the one hand, and overestimated the value the other hand, a weapon very violent and dangerous. A more careful consideration of the reasons that lead you to invoke and instincts that lead to demand from partners, enables us, in fact, to consider it critically, ie as a feature of verbal and written communication apparently able to facilitate understanding. You might also recognize the claim of clarity in certain circumstances, the will to use it as a mask to hide a pulse and a markedly authoritarian and violent. It is, in short, to expose what we actually want all those who demand clear and easily understandable words and ask if they will not hide a desire to dominate.
First we must ask questions about the plausibility of the reasons that lead to demand clarity in expression and argumentation, namely, in philosophical terms vaguely, if you can agree on a conception of language that rests in its transparency and its immediacy the premise and purpose of relational exchange. Mistresses and girlfriends, wives and children who insist on the point of clarity must necessarily believe that things of the world are already evident at the start and simply observe that we need to talk and to understand how they work. Not only that: they must also be convinced that the words clearly identify a reality and that there is already a consensus defined the conformation it assumes in the representation that gives us the language. It can therefore easily imagine how, at best, this radically unproblematic conception of reality and language that the document or explain, is generated by a clear epistemological naivete. We know very well, although sometimes it is convenient to forget that the world is not at all clear and logical and we need tools, such as language, to make it appear so. And we know then, although it is sometimes necessary to forget that words are not reality, but a means to represent and make, therefore, accessible to our understanding. Any representation, then, can only select, hide or highlight certain aspects of reality. The language always gives us a partial picture and perspective of the world even when it gets intersubjective consensus.
Those who do not understand us - or rather who refuse to accept not understand - then they run the risk, perhaps even unwittingly, to establish itself as inherently oppressive authoritarian model: the claim of clarity could hide the violent act to require everyone sees the world as we see them and that they give a representation corresponding to their way of expression. Under the guise of intelligibility may require, ultimately, that is talk to their words with those of their families and, therefore, may include without effort. Light is, in fact, what we understand and what we understand is also what is already known. The demand for clear words and things would then also hide unacknowledged mental sloth, laziness learning that inhibits the exploration of what is known beyond the borders. Authoritarianism and indolence report frequently to be hand in hand.
in the need for clarity, as in many violent behavior, you could see the symptom of a psychological weakness, in particular, may experience it as a symptomatic manifestation of insecurity. Clearly there are conformations so fearful of the psychological disorder that does not bear the slightest hint. And so they refuse to deal with the experience of chaos on them by a partner who, they say, would say things at random or irrelevant, or abstruse. It is therefore legitimate to suspect that they live in the minds of others waiting to find the same order that exists on their desk, in their drawers and in their libraries. The failure then to accept the possibility of different orders from them, would lead them to the arguments of an ethical and aesthetic based precisely guided by the clarity of expression and communication. That this mental process of removing their fears have its own opacity is twisted obviously an issue that may or may not want to face. However it is interesting to be surveyed critical beliefs that underlie the rejection of what appears to them as nonsense and chaos, most of the deepening of the psychological aspects that characterizes it. The most obvious and easily refuted belief is that simply means the dark as the negation of what is deemed clear. It - it is believed fallacy - would not have a foundation or its own reasons, but only destroy what others have laboriously built. It would, in short, a form of cannibalism because of the clarity that would live by eating other people product and return it in the dark.
In reality there is only one way to be clear and not a single way of being confused. Each schematization of reality, is that the simplification is that apparently should reproduce the chaos following its principles, its own order. This, then, that looks confusing and arbitrary as it may be ordered with its own logic, if you have the desire to linger in the observation and research. The pertinent question to ask yourself before darkness covers the principles, perhaps unknown to us, which is inspired and what is subjective expression. Incomprehensible speech should therefore be welcomed as an opportunity move the boundaries of what can be understood, to conceive different possibilities to introduce order and, in metaphorical terms, to walk in the direction of foreignness of our party. The suspend our conception of order and the delay in not understanding opens, in fact, a space to understand its uniqueness. The accept without anxiety not to understand, yet having to learn how to understand, should result in a wait undertaken to grant a representation of reality that you are not yet able to grasp the contours.
Darkness thus presents the advantage to recognize more clearly the subjective dimension of language and interpretive processes that implies: it is not the material logic of a system of encoded signs that must finally be understood, but the will of those who make use of these marks, a use that has some unique and unrepeatable. The subjective logic that underlies what we feel is clear and sensible inevitably fall into oblivion. The evidence of the way to forget the mediating function of language that carries with it the will of those who use it only as a trace, just as a suggestion. The immediacy with which it is clear that there reveals its meaning, illusion a certainty impossible - to have access to the actual intention of the speaker - and subtract the survey critical, since what we understand now is not under reflection. The reasons why the relevant questions about subjectivity, originality of those who express themselves, so many are in a clear text as they are in an obscure text.
clarity and obscurity are not ways to express themselves and to represent reality so different and so conflict between them, also clearly has its shadows, its secrets, only hidden them and makes it very difficult to identification. The darkness is a insidious dimension of clarity. To this can be a dangerous tool in the hands of those who want to impose as a general objective and that this binding, however, can always be special, subjective and worthy of critical response. The difference is rather in the function that gives expression and verbal communication. Proponents want the clarity of interpersonal understanding a thing that is obvious to happen every time you speak. Proponents of darkness, however, believe that understanding each other is a momentary thing that should be looked for and wanted every time you speak. One speaks when I think I understand something of the reality, others talk to understand something. 
"It is good and beautiful thing that you did not understand and what is even better when the new OCUR understanding makes it clear that you believed" (Friedrich Schlegel)
Many of us have had to deal with from an early age the reproach of not able to express ourselves clearly. "You speak and write more clearly," the teacher shouted at us with his stern look and signed in red with a "just enough", to little thoughts. "You can know what you tell me?" continued to ask his girlfriend first and then wife in front of our attempts to say anything clear at least the more mundane chores of everyday life. "Dad, I do not understand you, "was the phrase most often our children as soon as they realized that they have a thinking mind.
What then enjoy the clarity of great social and cultural prestige is testified to like about it, so say, is based on value judgments of a number of strikingly diverse disciplines and professions. Journalists, representatives, lawyers, teachers, doctors, clerks, politicians, ushers and so on, are good, they believe, if you explain in more simple and clearly as possible the affairs of their discipline and their work. In reality there are many reasons to consider that the clarity is, on the one hand, and overestimated the value the other hand, a weapon very violent and dangerous. A more careful consideration of the reasons that lead you to invoke and instincts that lead to demand from partners, enables us, in fact, to consider it critically, ie as a feature of verbal and written communication apparently able to facilitate understanding. You might also recognize the claim of clarity in certain circumstances, the will to use it as a mask to hide a pulse and a markedly authoritarian and violent. It is, in short, to expose what we actually want all those who demand clear and easily understandable words and ask if they will not hide a desire to dominate.
First we must ask questions about the plausibility of the reasons that lead to demand clarity in expression and argumentation, namely, in philosophical terms vaguely, if you can agree on a conception of language that rests in its transparency and its immediacy the premise and purpose of relational exchange. Mistresses and girlfriends, wives and children who insist on the point of clarity must necessarily believe that things of the world are already evident at the start and simply observe that we need to talk and to understand how they work. Not only that: they must also be convinced that the words clearly identify a reality and that there is already a consensus defined the conformation it assumes in the representation that gives us the language. It can therefore easily imagine how, at best, this radically unproblematic conception of reality and language that the document or explain, is generated by a clear epistemological naivete. We know very well, although sometimes it is convenient to forget that the world is not at all clear and logical and we need tools, such as language, to make it appear so. And we know then, although it is sometimes necessary to forget that words are not reality, but a means to represent and make, therefore, accessible to our understanding. Any representation, then, can only select, hide or highlight certain aspects of reality. The language always gives us a partial picture and perspective of the world even when it gets intersubjective consensus.
Those who do not understand us - or rather who refuse to accept not understand - then they run the risk, perhaps even unwittingly, to establish itself as inherently oppressive authoritarian model: the claim of clarity could hide the violent act to require everyone sees the world as we see them and that they give a representation corresponding to their way of expression. Under the guise of intelligibility may require, ultimately, that is talk to their words with those of their families and, therefore, may include without effort. Light is, in fact, what we understand and what we understand is also what is already known. The demand for clear words and things would then also hide unacknowledged mental sloth, laziness learning that inhibits the exploration of what is known beyond the borders. Authoritarianism and indolence report frequently to be hand in hand.
in the need for clarity, as in many violent behavior, you could see the symptom of a psychological weakness, in particular, may experience it as a symptomatic manifestation of insecurity. Clearly there are conformations so fearful of the psychological disorder that does not bear the slightest hint. And so they refuse to deal with the experience of chaos on them by a partner who, they say, would say things at random or irrelevant, or abstruse. It is therefore legitimate to suspect that they live in the minds of others waiting to find the same order that exists on their desk, in their drawers and in their libraries. The failure then to accept the possibility of different orders from them, would lead them to the arguments of an ethical and aesthetic based precisely guided by the clarity of expression and communication. That this mental process of removing their fears have its own opacity is twisted obviously an issue that may or may not want to face. However it is interesting to be surveyed critical beliefs that underlie the rejection of what appears to them as nonsense and chaos, most of the deepening of the psychological aspects that characterizes it. The most obvious and easily refuted belief is that simply means the dark as the negation of what is deemed clear. It - it is believed fallacy - would not have a foundation or its own reasons, but only destroy what others have laboriously built. It would, in short, a form of cannibalism because of the clarity that would live by eating other people product and return it in the dark.
In reality there is only one way to be clear and not a single way of being confused. Each schematization of reality, is that the simplification is that apparently should reproduce the chaos following its principles, its own order. This, then, that looks confusing and arbitrary as it may be ordered with its own logic, if you have the desire to linger in the observation and research. The pertinent question to ask yourself before darkness covers the principles, perhaps unknown to us, which is inspired and what is subjective expression. Incomprehensible speech should therefore be welcomed as an opportunity move the boundaries of what can be understood, to conceive different possibilities to introduce order and, in metaphorical terms, to walk in the direction of foreignness of our party. The suspend our conception of order and the delay in not understanding opens, in fact, a space to understand its uniqueness. The accept without anxiety not to understand, yet having to learn how to understand, should result in a wait undertaken to grant a representation of reality that you are not yet able to grasp the contours.
Darkness thus presents the advantage to recognize more clearly the subjective dimension of language and interpretive processes that implies: it is not the material logic of a system of encoded signs that must finally be understood, but the will of those who make use of these marks, a use that has some unique and unrepeatable. The subjective logic that underlies what we feel is clear and sensible inevitably fall into oblivion. The evidence of the way to forget the mediating function of language that carries with it the will of those who use it only as a trace, just as a suggestion. The immediacy with which it is clear that there reveals its meaning, illusion a certainty impossible - to have access to the actual intention of the speaker - and subtract the survey critical, since what we understand now is not under reflection. The reasons why the relevant questions about subjectivity, originality of those who express themselves, so many are in a clear text as they are in an obscure text.
clarity and obscurity are not ways to express themselves and to represent reality so different and so conflict between them, also clearly has its shadows, its secrets, only hidden them and makes it very difficult to identification. The darkness is a insidious dimension of clarity. To this can be a dangerous tool in the hands of those who want to impose as a general objective and that this binding, however, can always be special, subjective and worthy of critical response. The difference is rather in the function that gives expression and verbal communication. Proponents want the clarity of interpersonal understanding a thing that is obvious to happen every time you speak. Proponents of darkness, however, believe that understanding each other is a momentary thing that should be looked for and wanted every time you speak. One speaks when I think I understand something of the reality, others talk to understand something.
Turtle Wax Product In Banglore
Piero Calamandrei - Speech on the Constitution to students in Milan 1955
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Does Omeprazole Completely Rid Of
/ / Dancewear California / / partner of the National Review dance schools "City in Dance" Lodi 2011
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Vedios Of Breast Feeding
Micam: Repetto presents the new collection autumn - winter 2011/2012
http://styleandfashion.blogosfere.it/2011/03/micam-repetto-presenta-la-nuova-collezione-autunno---inverno-20112012.html 
Mysore Mallige Freeonline Watch
Here's the video of Willow Smith for "21st Century Girl" VIDEO
http://www.fashiontimes.it/2011/03/ecco-il-video-di-willow-smith-per-21st-century-girl-video/ 
Saturday, March 5, 2011
School Fete Invitation Wordings
Sunday, March 6, 2011
37 ^ walk between the farms
ValeraFratta LO, Italy
Sunday, 03/06/2011 from 8:30 to 9:00
ValeraFratta LO, Italy
Sunday, 03/06/2011 from 8:30 to 9:00
Type: Non-competitive
Distance: ; 6 - 13 to 21
Distance: ; 6 - 13 to 21
Path: 
Organization: GP Valera Fratta
Organization: GP Valera Fratta
4 th of Gir from sběr Fanench
Oratorio Offanengo CR, Italy
Sunday, 03/06/2011 from 8:00 to 9:00
Oratorio Offanengo CR, Italy
Sunday, 03/06/2011 from 8:00 to 9:00
Type: Non-competitive
Distance: 7 - 14-21
Distance: 7 - 14-21
Path:
Organization: Running CSO Offanengo
Organization: Running CSO Offanengo
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Briggs Air Vane Governor
"The prejudices of the individual, far more than his judgments, they are the truth of his being"
(Hans Georg Gadamer)
(Hans Georg Gadamer)
certainly can not say that prejudices enjoy a good reputation. If even defects such as intolerance, or even real crimes such as racism, you are willing to even admit to a slight contamination with adversative sentences like "I'm tolerant, but ..." "I'm not a racist, but ... "is very unusual for someone to relativize their ability to recognize and avoid them. They are so numerous and so serious criticism to which they are facts that all or nearly all, are careful not admit of being infected in any way. The metaphors that are harmful aspects have nothing to envy in negativity to those who suggest the Deadly Sins, the "wedding of evil" as Aristotle calls them. They are "wearing", it is believed, as you put blinders on and blinkers, we all know, foolishly restrict our attention, we deny the overview of each of us, we still believe, could have, only the wanted. The prejudices, we still know, as glasses are deforming, and every time we put them preclude us look at things as they are, we see the world of facts, and ideas of bodies, but only one crippled by the filter of misleading fake glasses.
Who then has the ambition to uncover the rational conceptual errors that preaches them based on the absence in that which characterizes them, or should characterize the true, the authentic exercise of thinking: the thinking, the ponderosa and discern. In their place will be fixed ideas about mechanisms that can not be blocked or influenced by reasoning nor by experience. Therefore reflects a radical form of unconsciousness and absolutely not because it would leave to remove or experience or by reasoning.
Because they are so considered the emblem of all ignorance and narrow-mindedness, is very seldom the case in which someone calmly accept and recognize their own to draw the necessary consequences. The mote in our neighbor is known to be much more visibility of its beam. And so, in general, yes hunts them only where they are most obvious: those that occur in the attitudes and arguments of others. The prey is easy because it's easy to be right when you report an injury. It is, on closer inspection, the same ease of a thought supported by a preliminary scheme: we shall immediately and without much effort no doubt review.
In fact, if you really intend to hunt them down, should pursue, hunt down and kill all the prejudices, not just those that seem most obvious, even their own then. Among the latter is certainly one can mention more subtle bias, namely the prejudice against prejudice: not so sure, on reflection, that they are so useless and harmful as people think. At negative bias against them certainly contributes to, in turn, biased overestimation of what is commonly meant by legal proceedings. An assessment differs from the injury, it would even be the opposite, because it would be the result of pure reflection, careful consideration and discernment. It would be short, the product of our attention is not limited on things, a look, therefore, able to seize them in their entirety and in their factuality. On the one hand, from the injury, we would find a partial perspective on reality and inattentive to what it actually is, and second, that of the trial, we find attention to both the totality of reality and its objective conformation. A trial, thus, is opposed to the injury of a virtually unassailable position: it would be the perfect product of ideal conditions as perfect. It is assumed that whoever is able to express an opinion free from bias, can open up their perspective and mind in every significant dimension of reality and can be abstracted from a particular perspective to capture the world of things, persons and ideas that are in themselves. So they arise independently gaze that observes and the mind that understands. This assumption can not itself be highly preconceptual, indeed quite illusory since it relies on a certain denied in the most radical experience and reason: the belief that man is able to break free from constraints, from associated with its contingency, its historicity, its temporality. Thinking outside the world in which we act and it is reflected that can not be the result of an illusion, namely dell'inammissibile claim to be able to enjoy a perspective outside of time and a clearly defined by precise boundaries. Remain in them, find a boundary after another limiting constantly looking perspective and makes it therefore unstable and constantly changed, is what characterizes the human condition and is also what marks its own judgments, not just their own prejudices.
For these reasons, a closer look, judgments and prejudices between the distance is not so great as is commonly believed, and differences were noted by more than a temporal level, primarily historical, not on the logic of reason. What distinguishes a review from an adverse effect is thus fundamentally related to time and space, not the rigor or completeness of knowledge with which you will get. The story, among many other things, teaches us how this than in the past was considered a case of course, eventually took the form of a preliminary knowledge. The history of science, for example, is nothing but the history of valid knowledge that over time, with "progress" were downgraded to limited knowledge knowledge based on erroneous and incomplete, therefore biased. The Galilean physics, just to mention one of the clearest examples in this regard, it seems to us both ruling and the result of a limited perspective, but rather what it replaced, namely the one that made us believe it was the sun going down over the ' horizon and not the earth to rotate around itself hiding. So much so that the prose of Galileo can be considered just like poetry, not science. The rest are still poetic texts they send us into ecstasy with just that enchanting sunsets and moons that we revel in its diverse forms.
The difference between a trial and an injury is detected in a given because their temporality is linked essentially to their duration: the longer a knowledge is valid and most live below the species of the trial. Each time you acquire new knowledge, every time you look at reality from different point of view, here the previous reviews seem inexorably in their capacity as prejudices. Why despise them just because, like all human affairs, their fate is time being, to stay in time and, therefore, to change? The age can never be neither a crime nor a reason to blame because that is what remains as indelible character of man and of all that concerns him. The war against prejudice, the struggle waged by the Enlightenment, would result in paradoxical forms based on a dream if it were human, too human, to be able to assign ratings divine prerogatives as finality, universality ol'atemporalità. What can combat irrational prejudices, biases and judgments that are not yet, is their acceptance as the possibility of knowledge and experience, not the illusion of their removal from the human condition. Already in the acceptance of their temporary nature and willingness to investigate the conditions quotas, is a gesture of knowledge given to the rationality that belongs to us. The more one is aware of the transience of all judgments, the more one is conscious of its dependence on the given conditions, the more there is need to compare judgments made in other conditions
Without ruling, however, expectations, without our limited and partial construction of what do not know better, there is the possibility of any knowledge. To meet each other or to face the unknown we need to figure using the few elements of knowledge we have. Only by comparing the representation made by the glimmer of our knowledge and that produced by subsequent knowledge allows us to understand things differently and, therefore, better. The revision of our prejudices opens us to a knowledge that changes the shape of our skyline. To be able to make any injury, and then have the ability to recognize it as such - for example, that the Anglo-Saxon food is bad or, conversely, that Italians do not know how to enjoy the pleasure to drink a coffee - it is imperative that an Italian has at least a vague idea of \u200b\u200bwhat are the blood pudding, or a UK has at least as seen in photos are the Italian bars. Only through the injury creates expectations that can then be confirmed and denied. Without the injury, there can certainly be no clash and no waste, but no meeting and no change in their positions. And it is precisely the injury while making conscious that there are other ways to eat or a drink. It is then up to everyone to decide for themselves what they like and whether and how to change their tastes.
You can then well be argued that the prejudices have their basic utilities: they are the indispensable first step of knowledge, provide opportunities to recognize it as a temporary and limited and therefore change; offer, ultimately, consciousness than is necessary in all its confirmation or its revision. The experience that we have leads to an awareness of radical criticism that there is no knowledge which may be recognized as the authority to impose themselves without being subjected to a review of current aspects of ruling.
Injuries have, however, a function which too often forgets the importance. And 'thank you to them if we can demonstrate and also reveal what we are helpless with all our limitations. In the prejudices we express no possibility of hiding in the guise of caution and certainty provide to the thought and experience shared. The certain knowledge that achieve consensus - the collective opinions that no one recognizes even in their capacity as prejudice - say nothing of us, hide what is ours distinguishes us and makes us unique. Any attempt to unify moves into the background what in us is more authentic and truthful. Our prejudices are a reflection of who we are with all our limitations, our limited possibilities. When we let our prejudices occur freely we can not lie, we can not put the mask of a faultless accuracy. It is then due to their free deployment that we recognize how we are and we can measure both the differences between us and them, between what is believe and what we believe. In this way we can offer is to compare ourselves with others, both to rebuild our location, our history. In this sense, the condemnation of the injury as a knowledge not true can not lead them to deny the truth: they speak of us, as we were, and how we have become. They teach us that we are on the way, rooted in the knowledge that reliable and stable is to ignore the path we are on.
1
Cost Of Extracting #8 Tooh
Jeremy Scott x Adidas Originals ballerina with wings
http://www.fashionblog.it/post/12556/jeremy-scott-x-adidas-originals-ballerine-con-le-ali 
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
How To Get Rid Of Waves In Projection Screen
A woman warrior for Dimension Dance
http : / / www.fashiontimes.it/2011/03/una-donna-guerriera-per-dimensione-danza/ 
Compustar Reviews 2010
TRIUMPHS AGAIN THE DANCE: 250,000 VISITORS TO Danzainfiera
Florence, February 27, 2011 concludes in the sixth edition of Danzainfiera, the most important international event dedicated to the world of dance that This year, for four days, filled the Fortezza da Basso in Florence, an increase of 10% of the public compared with 2010. About 250,000 visitors have flocked from all over Italy for an event which this year has smashed all records: 14 halls, 65,000 sqm of space in total, 13 thousand square meters of exhibition space, 5 boxes and 3-track, 25 000 dancers and many schools and dance groups from all over Italy.
"I am very pleased with the influx of this sixth edition - has declared the patron of Alexander Danzainfiera Sanesi - The event continues to grow and the numbers give us reason, and tomorrow we will start working next year's edition. We want to bring the spirit Danzainfiera in the streets and theaters of every Italian city, "said Sanesi.
were over 400 events in four days they did dance Florence, with a special program that involved every discipline and genre of dance, from classical to belly dance, hip hop, samba, country dances Eastern from the lessons of Cheerleading, the Twirling, from burlesque to rollerblading. Hilarious
the live broadcast of Radio Kiss Kiss by Marco Baldini who interviewed the children of "Friends" dressed in traditional costumes of burlesque, complete with feather boas and masks.
The event ended with the last special guest, the greatest dancer Tango living, Roberto Herrera who gave a lesson to all lovers of tango and gave everyone a gem of his show "Buenos Aires Tango show.'' Impossible to mention all the other events that have taken the bench in recent days, among which we remember the Grand Gala Opening of MaggioDanza the Expression Competition 2011, the Third Edition of the Prize that MPS Italy Dancing, the Musical Day 5, "The Twilight" in dance, Burlesque Mania, "The Black Souls" the new show of the children of friends.
Many dancers and artists who were guests of the event including Carla Fracci, Giuseppe Picone, Ruben Celiberti, Francesco Gizzi, Alex Macario, Laura Escalada Piazzolla, Kledi Kadiu, Salvatore Manzo and many others.
Among the successes of this year to include certainly the area of \u200b\u200b500 square meters dedicated to Pilates in conjunction with Cruisin 'and the many competitions in dancesport Danzainfiera that led to the World Championships, World Cup and the Italian Championship with ANMB, FIDA and IDC and many disciplines involved, from tango to the Caribbean. The FIDS (Italian Dance Sport Federation) has taught us all to become skilled dancers also ... in an hour!
If there was, or if there will be a meeting Danzainfiera 2012!
The event was held in Florence at the Fortezza da Basso, February 24 to 27, in a festive atmosphere and passion!
"I am very pleased with the influx of this sixth edition - has declared the patron of Alexander Danzainfiera Sanesi - The event continues to grow and the numbers give us reason, and tomorrow we will start working next year's edition. We want to bring the spirit Danzainfiera in the streets and theaters of every Italian city, "said Sanesi.
were over 400 events in four days they did dance Florence, with a special program that involved every discipline and genre of dance, from classical to belly dance, hip hop, samba, country dances Eastern from the lessons of Cheerleading, the Twirling, from burlesque to rollerblading. Hilarious
the live broadcast of Radio Kiss Kiss by Marco Baldini who interviewed the children of "Friends" dressed in traditional costumes of burlesque, complete with feather boas and masks.
The event ended with the last special guest, the greatest dancer Tango living, Roberto Herrera who gave a lesson to all lovers of tango and gave everyone a gem of his show "Buenos Aires Tango show.'' Impossible to mention all the other events that have taken the bench in recent days, among which we remember the Grand Gala Opening of MaggioDanza the Expression Competition 2011, the Third Edition of the Prize that MPS Italy Dancing, the Musical Day 5, "The Twilight" in dance, Burlesque Mania, "The Black Souls" the new show of the children of friends.
Many dancers and artists who were guests of the event including Carla Fracci, Giuseppe Picone, Ruben Celiberti, Francesco Gizzi, Alex Macario, Laura Escalada Piazzolla, Kledi Kadiu, Salvatore Manzo and many others.
Among the successes of this year to include certainly the area of \u200b\u200b500 square meters dedicated to Pilates in conjunction with Cruisin 'and the many competitions in dancesport Danzainfiera that led to the World Championships, World Cup and the Italian Championship with ANMB, FIDA and IDC and many disciplines involved, from tango to the Caribbean. The FIDS (Italian Dance Sport Federation) has taught us all to become skilled dancers also ... in an hour!
If there was, or if there will be a meeting Danzainfiera 2012!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)