Implantation Bleeding Way Before Period

infidelity '

"Kein Zweifel, der Hund ist treu. Aber Deshalb sollen wir uns ein Beispiel an ihm nehmen?
Er ist doch treu dem Menschen und nicht dem Hund"
Karl Kraus, 251/252 Fackel 39, Sprüche und Widerspruch

between the values \u200b\u200bof which more than lamenting the decline, loyalty is no doubt that returns more often in the most obvious and daily complaints laudatores temporis acti, "once was enough to shake hands," a time the family was together because the couple were faithful, "" how many flags, how many turncoats are out there today "and so on in a long litany. What prevails is the idea that loyalty belongs to a past world to the good. The betrayal on the other hand belong to the contemporary world and would be a world of evil. On the side of loyalty there would be qualities that contribute to the common good as consistency, determination and selflessness, and help to make the happiest man as an individual and as a social being. On the side of treason but there would be opposite qualities, namely defects such as inconsistency, indifference, self-love that abbruttirebbero the individual and the human community to which it belongs.
In fact, the idea of \u200b\u200bloyalty, especially for couples, collecting, at least in words, always and in various contexts consensus. The high and ancient biblical word that requires the man to leave his father and his mother to join his wife in order to form an indivisible one flesh (Genesis 2:24) it can be confirmed even in the most pleasant of contemporary readings. The not so authoritative magazine Donna Moderna, for example, reported in early August 2010 a survey agency Swg that nine out of ten Italians say they believe strongly in loyalty.

In view of the universal prestige it enjoys and has enjoyed since the dawn of time loyalty, it is amazing that just an animal like the dog he has become the emblem. How, in fact, is the lowest estimate given to this animal by humans is demonstrated by the way they say none exists in which it has emphasized a minimal positive quality. All that concerns him is despicable: the die or live like him, lead him hither to the yard while asleep or awake, the kicking him or take him with respect instead of the master, straighten your legs or be his son. The language thus brings a significant mark of contempt by the men and paid it, by implication, that take account of the quality of fidelity to him explicitly assigned.
It is therefore logical to think that if the dog is a symbol of loyalty shows that the bottom is an intimate and explicit contempt for this quality of human character. The constancy, obedience and self-denial are characteristics of the dog evidently appreciated only in appearance. In truth, not so secretly, he mocks the lack of autonomy, blind obedience to the will of others, become the servant at all times. Moreover, a being who attacks the enemy for bias and, with the same blunt mechanism defends his friend, who is able to be a martyr just to please the master and is willing, for the same reason, to become instruments of the most monstrous atrocities certainly can not assert as a model worthy of imitation and example. As a human being who takes delight in his ability to judge can aspire to emulation those who decide once and for all what should be his behavior? It is rather to think of a computer is entered into a software immovable. No human being has a minimum of self-esteem can aspire to mimic a machine, no matter what happens, always completes the usual procedures.

a closer look, then, why humans do not take in their private account of the great virtues of fidelity, although the public who do not sing her praises, are not so objectionable. Already in the Middle Ages - an era in which perhaps as never before in any other ideal of loyalty has occupied the minds of men - The question is not so simple as it shows itself today in many public statements. Both in courtly poetry, both in Dolce stil novo the love song is a question of loyalty intimate and private, even secret: there is thus true love if it is lived in secret. And love is unfaithful to excellence, the clandestine love, which requires, paradoxically, a double allegiance: one that combines in secret and that which unites in love. The idea that loyalty is an aspiration, however, too high for those who rely only to human will expresses a great medieval poet as the author of Parzival , Wolframs von Eschenbach. This concludes that only rely on a religious dimension allows one to make full experience. To find the strength to be faithful man must get back to heaven, an instance that is higher. You then Spinosa, one of the most influential philosophers of modern thought, that the ideal of loyalty begins to waver under the pretense of human discern between different instances to trust. Not only the sky but the earth deserves unconditional acceptance of man that is that belongs to it. Although Machiavelli considered the same commendable fidelity, live with fairness and consistency, will retain the power to identify areas where human Viga the right to refrain from any practices which it has inspired. The exercise of power is one of them. The prince, who wants to achieve and maintain his power must have the quality dell'astuzia, not loyalty. The man of modern science then clearly we recognize the right to determine their behavior based on choice and autonomy to meet the objectives set by himself and by any other instance. Fidelity falls into disrepute because it deprives man of the privilege of human discernment to be left to forces beyond his will and his ability to disregard the wishes and plans. A faithful man is not in the hands of himself but of those to whom we surrender. The Baroque period
revealing a particular sensitivity for the transience of time, you open an examination of what the man disenchanted raves as durable. If human existence is so tenuous and fleeting as it may be anchored to what, as a pact of fidelity, relies on the stability and durability? In the Baroque drama, especially the German one, we debrief on the ambiguous and ephemeral nature of a relationship that is based on loyalty to excellence, the one between the prince and the leader. Their relationship is apparently only one between master and slave because it is true that the leader is to serve the prince is also true that he gets and consolidates his power leaning force of the first. Since Therefore, security and power of the prince is in the hands of the leader, they might at any moment turn against the same force that protects and supports it. The leader can be so faithful servant, but having every moment the possibility of breaking the pact of allegiance, in power on the existence of his master. The same security features that has within it the seeds of instability because the very one that I guarantee can escape at any time.

's covenant of faithfulness in love relationships has very different consequences on the balance of power between the lovers. The lover who satisfies the need for security of the beloved swearing everlasting loyalty, seized also the power to steal at will be sure that the offers. Each of the lovers attorney so the security of having the other at his side, but at the same time the leaves in the hands of others. This duplicity of supply and demand for loyalty become weapons for which one has more desire for power or is more desirous of independence. Who provides security grabs power in some respects very sneaky because it hides their need for certainty with the mask of love with certain expectations. No less insidious, actually, is the attitude of those who in the name of the authenticity of its feeling on the other hand requires the pact of fidelity. The gift apparently selfless love of the guarantee of balance and unique can be simply the intent to take possession of what the most popular of which want and need most: stability. It is, therefore, of a love that is nourished by the weakness of others, which stimulates and strengthens. The provision of security can not be an illusion because that then gives a gift which no mortal can possess: the certainty of what will be the conditions that must be changed each time the deal. Only the loss of the gesture to represent and ensure their loyalty, and its entry into the risky game, painful and subversive possibilities of betrayal, is a prerequisite for power choose, every time it shows the opportunity, gestures and attitudes faithful.

Describe a relationship built on loyalty as a means to adjust the balance of power, not on dialogue and negotiation of mutual needs and mutable. You do not need to convince, win, find points of contact: everything has to happen along the lines of decisions already taken. Where there are only terms to be followed there can be no dialogue and mediation behavior. The language that builds and revitalizes the report is sterile and anaffective law. For the true lover confessed that should nevertheless keep alive in themselves the power of human choice and risk, is unavoidable warn the first Eventually the precepts of slavery and its temptation to emancipation. It is unlikely that the path of liberation from the weight makes them indifferent to the sensitivity of the beloved. But infidelity, to the point, is simply the release by someone, not for themselves. Rather than the triumph of autonomy and individuality becomes a gesture forced, not free choice. Only someone who accepts his infidelity can freely choose and opt for loyalty. And it is immaterial whether this decision is as it were, protected by what his reason tells him is good and useful or instead arises from the risk - such as Levinas describes the experience of love - A leap in the dark, with a membership to another without claiming to know it in its fullness.

Moreover, even recent history, not just passed down from the writings of the past, shows how dangerous, even criminal, to base their behavior on a priori choice indifferent to the effects it produces. The assumption of duty of fidelity, it is revealed especially in the tragic events of the last century, turns out to be a devious ploy to lean on the stronger and get rid of the responsibility of a score on how they use its power. The act became futile in the name of principles above the individual will in no case, however, can not leave the weight of responsibility if the power turns out to be inhuman. The harm caused is indeed a faithful servant of evil "banal" occur in his abandonment of human faculty of understanding, discernment and action awareness. Not unlike in interpersonal relationships when the pact of loyalty is not conceived in the risk of a decision always be revised, if not then contemplate the possibility of betrayal, empty beings who shake their human prerogatives. A human being who wants to liberate themselves from the choice and the risk is not emancipated, but the unpredictability of their humanity. The violence of subversion in which he believes to escape with the mask of loyalty produces a far more violence radical, namely that suppresses the very thing that makes man more human: the responsibility of choice, the acceptance of the possibility of failure, rely on the unpredictability of becoming. The only possible fidelity is to the human condition and this form of loyalty requires the risk of numerous infidelities.